Estimates of the number of salmon and steelhead returning to the Columbia River Basin are generally made by summing (1) harvest in the Columbia River downstream from Bonneville Dam, (2) runs into tributaries downstream from Bonneville Dam, and (3) counts at Bonneville Dam. Because fish entering tributaries downstream from Bonneville Dam may not be completely counted, some estimates are considered “minimum”.
Numbers of fish entering the Columbia River reached a relative high in 2001 and generally declined until increases from 2008 through 2010. Increases have been partially a result of record returns of sockeye salmon, and relatively high returns of coho salmon and steelhead. The number of spring Chinook salmon in 2010 was the highest since 2001 and the second highest since 1970.
Updated: 7/26/2011
Updated: 7/25/2011
Updated: 9/28/2010
Updated: 3/18/2010
Updated: 3/18/2010
Notes :
1. Wild/hatchery ratio for Summer Chinook estimated from observations of fin-clipped fish at Bonneville Dam in July.
2. Most coho passing Bonneville Dam are likely of hatchery origin but the majority are not fin clipped. They are therefore considered unknown.
3. All sockeye are considered wild; however, some Upper Columbia fish are raised in net pens.
View Data
Year
Chinook Fall
Chinook Spring
Chinook Summer
Chum
Coho
Sockeye
Steelhead Summer
Steelhead Winter
Total
1970
452,000
237,800
55,200
1,200
895,300
95,400
157,000
134,500
2,028,400
1971
428,900
241,500
71,900
1,100
544,500
150,500
248,500
169,200
1,856,100
1972
285,500
334,700
67,800
2,400
277,800
123,300
257,800
113,000
1,462,300
1973
482,500
307,700
37,600
1,800
291,200
61,300
217,000
90,900
1,490,000
1974
290,500
206,900
28,900
1,200
460,900
43,800
168,900
77,700
1,278,800
1975
453,900
166,500
33,000
800
292,500
58,200
105,400
62,000
1,172,300
1976
448,700
144,700
26,700
1,500
337,000
43,700
147,800
55,400
1,205,500
1977
361,300
230,500
34,300
800
93,800
99,800
238,500
112,100
1,171,100
1978
328,400
233,700
38,700
1,900
307,500
18,400
154,500
77,100
1,160,200
1979
296,400
117,300
27,800
300
276,500
52,600
146,300
114,100
1,031,300
1980
321,200
126,100
22,991
500
301,600
58,886
177,400
80,600
1,089,277
1981
283,900
157,400
19,124
1,500
170,300
56,037
217,700
67,000
972,961
1982
360,700
181,400
14,677
2,900
453,100
50,319
207,900
46,000
1,316,996
1983
241,200
149,300
13,576
600
100,500
100,628
240,200
67,700
913,704
1984
305,500
163,100
18,999
2,300
414,200
161,886
388,400
94,400
1,548,785
1985
361,600
168,100
19,084
1,300
366,200
200,759
405,300
77,300
1,599,643
1986
494,800
210,800
19,307
3,000
1,527,900
59,963
474,200
85,000
2,874,970
1987
871,000
232,400
23,604
2,500
307,500
145,546
364,400
91,700
2,038,650
1988
784,700
239,900
23,397
4,800
664,800
99,780
362,800
59,300
2,239,477
1989
552,100
219,800
22,739
2,000
701,800
47,479
327,800
68,000
1,941,718
1990
313,000
255,481
19,296
2,900
196,000
49,754
247,400
44,700
1,128,531
1991
276,100
193,307
14,569
1,300
934,300
76,484
311,000
63,200
1,870,260
1992
219,000
194,879
9,796
4,900
211,300
85,000
372,100
55,900
1,152,875
1993
214,900
209,728
14,781
4,500
113,900
91,727
242,800
36,400
928,736
1994
254,000
83,778
14,977
1,200
168,800
12,863
212,100
52,200
799,918
1995
242,800
62,900
12,615
1,500
74,900
9,667
247,100
20,100
671,582
1996
330,800
97,587
12,333
3,300
111,600
30,899
244,100
26,500
857,119
1997
321,500
169,384
18,277
1,700
148,100
47,487
292,500
15,300
1,014,248
1998
255,400
96,163
16,332
1,900
163,700
13,220
216,400
23,600
786,715
1999
313,200
105,930
22,347
2,400
274,200
17,878
235,700
23,300
994,955
2000
255,000
258,333
23,169
2,500
547,700
93,757
318,800
30,400
1,529,659
2001
548,800
538,604
54,935
5,500
1,108,500
120,361
710,300
21,825
3,108,825
2002
733,600
481,077
92,820
11,900
500,100
50,539
600,300
33,711
2,504,047
2003
893,100
405,895
83,120
87,600
677,400
39,375
436,600
23,452
2,646,542
2004
799,000
421,535
65,446
11,325
442,600
130,045
423,700
29,566
2,323,217
2005
561,400
192,158
60,060
3,300
342,000
77,352
388,200
14,672
1,639,142
2006
422,400
223,944
76,196
4,528
383,100
37,067
336,300
16,613
1,500,148
2007
219,600
150,973
37,190
2,349
318,600
26,114
328,700
14,985
1,098,511
2008
449,000
223,600
55,500
2,129
471,700
214,500
416,200
35,300
1,867,929
2009
430,500
222,732
53,878
2,330
721,600
178,968
668,619
11,367
2,289,994
2010
657,100
468,379
72,346
0
441,100
387,858
507,718
19,000
2,553,501
Counts of Adult Salmon and Steelhead at Bonneville Dam (1970-2010) 10, 231, 232
Because it is the lowermost dam on the Columbia River, counts of salmon and steelhead at Bonneville Dam provide information important to the management of upriver stocks. Fish are counted at windows in fish ladders, either directly or by viewing video tape.
Similar to estimates of fish entering the Columbia River, counts at Bonneville Dam declined from 2001-2007, then increased from 2008 through 2010.
Counts at Bonneville Dam generally follow the same trend as estimates at the Columbia River mouth; however, this relationship is affected to varying degrees by individual species or races. For example, large numbers of coho salmon entering the Columbia River do not often result in high counts at Bonneville Dam because most coho salmon spawn or are harvested in the lower river.
Updated: 4/6/2011
View Data
Year
Chinook Fall
Chinook Spring
Chinook Summer
Chum
Coho
Sockeye
Steelhead
Total
1970
159,713
103,047
51,272
209
54,868
70,762
113,510
553,381
1971
152,862
109,544
66,334
29
53,817
87,447
193,966
663,999
1972
94,149
178,305
63,583
1
34,216
56,323
185,886
612,463
1973
148,066
135,432
35,338
43
25,849
58,979
157,823
561,530
1974
125,246
124,134
39,030
23
31,605
43,837
137,054
500,929
1975
219,483
97,866
32,971
11
32,772
58,212
85,540
526,855
1976
228,489
92,613
43,805
11
36,666
43,611
124,177
569,372
1977
132,025
115,551
34,083
17
9,325
99,829
193,437
584,267
1978
144,913
147,680
39,730
28
30,278
18,436
104,431
485,496
1979
143,955
48,638
27,742
1
26,612
52,627
114,010
413,585
1980
127,718
53,100
26,952
44
12,974
58,882
129,254
408,924
1981
147,109
62,827
22,363
4
21,935
56,037
159,270
469,545
1982
157,771
70,011
20,129
12
55,816
50,219
157,640
511,598
1983
113,270
54,898
18,046
50
8,402
100,542
218,419
513,627
1984
147,278
46,870
22,321
64
16,604
152,540
315,795
701,472
1985
186,792
83,113
23,898
97
38,504
165,933
330,170
828,507
1986
226,404
118,371
26,300
77
108,587
58,099
376,752
914,590
1987
336,950
98,573
33,033
147
17,921
116,956
300,351
903,931
1988
290,050
90,532
31,315
60
27,038
79,721
279,277
797,993
1989
263,149
81,267
28,786
16
27,422
41,884
287,802
730,326
1990
177,392
94,014
24,983
26
11,641
49,581
183,011
540,648
1991
150,190
57,346
18,897
5
60,417
76,482
274,535
637,872
1992
116,200
88,425
15,063
37
14,369
84,992
314,974
634,060
1993
126,472
110,820
22,045
11
10,642
80,178
188,386
538,554
1994
170,397
20,169
17,631
22
20,291
12,678
161,978
403,166
1995
164,197
10,192
15,030
26
10,397
8,774
202,448
411,064
1996
205,358
51,493
16,034
25
15,737
30,252
205,213
524,112
1997
218,734
114,000
27,939
15
24,061
47,008
258,385
690,142
1998
189,085
38,342
21,433
0
46,290
13,218
185,094
493,462
1999
242,143
38,669
26,169
43
40,684
17,875
206,488
572,071
2000
192,815
178,302
30,616
38
85,734
93,398
275,273
856,176
2001
400,410
391,367
76,156
58
259,756
114,934
633,464
1,876,145
2002
474,554
268,813
127,436
72
88,459
49,610
481,203
1,490,147
2003
610,336
192,010
114,808
326
125,743
39,291
361,412
1,443,926
2004
583,422
170,152
92,143
77
115,041
123,291
311,122
1,395,248
2005
417,057
74,038
79,208
128
83,321
72,971
314,721
1,041,444
2006
299,161
96,456
97,519
121
101,087
37,066
333,250
964,660
2007
159,427
67,482
47,412
95
91,994
24,376
320,931
711,717
2008
314,995
125,543
78,271
66
135,399
213,607
356,186
1,224,067
2009
283,691
114,525
81,936
86
224,597
177,823
603,264
1,485,922
2010
467,475
244,384
97,604
1,060
120,295
386,525
412,721
1,730,064
Counts of Adult Salmon and Steelhead at Priest Rapids Dam (1970-2010) 10
All Upper Columbia River fish must pass Priest Rapids Dam, including endangered Upper Columbia River spring Chinook salmon and threatened steelhead. General trends have been similar to those at the river mouth and at Bonneville Dam. A record number of sockeye in 2010 resulted in a large increase in total numbers of fish from 2009.
Updated: 4/6/2011
View Data
Year
Chinook Fall
Chinook Spring
Chinook Summer
Coho
Sockeye
Steelhead
Total
1970
7
5
13
2
78
0
105
1971
9
5
16
7
74
0
110
1972
5
8
13
2
45
0
74
1973
5
9
12
1
54
0
82
1974
5
11
13
1
35
0
65
1975
4
8
19
0
55
0
86
1976
6
12
17
1
33
0
68
1977
4
21
16
0
95
10
146
1978
5
21
21
0
18
5
69
1979
5
7
20
0
46
8
87
1980
6
9
16
0
52
9
91
1981
4
14
12
0
51
9
91
1982
9
9
9
1
40
11
79
1983
8
10
9
0
90
32
149
1984
8
12
16
0
114
26
176
1985
11
24
16
0
119
35
204
1986
19
22
16
0
43
22
122
1987
35
19
14
0
77
14
159
1988
22
13
13
0
51
10
110
1989
15
12
20
0
45
11
102
1990
6
12
16
0
46
8
88
1991
5
8
15
0
71
14
113
1992
4
20
9
0
81
14
127
1993
7
29
16
0
83
5
141
1994
12
3
15
0
12
7
49
1995
13
1
12
0
9
4
40
1996
13
2
11
0
29
8
64
1997
11
7
13
0
45
9
85
1998
10
4
13
0
11
6
44
1999
30
4
21
0
16
8
79
2000
39
20
22
0
90
11
182
2001
24
50
53
10
111
30
279
2002
27
34
96
1
48
16
222
2003
49
18
83
5
37
18
209
2004
44
14
67
5
125
19
273
2005
31
14
61
1
75
12
195
2006
19
9
57
3
27
10
125
2007
23
7
31
11
25
15
111
2008
34
12
39
6
197
17
304
2009
41
13
49
11
153
40
308
2010
39
31
49
2
357
26
504
Counts of Adult Salmon and Steelhead at Lower Granite Dam (1970-2010) 10
Endangered Snake River sockeye salmon must pass Lower Granite Dam, as must threatened Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon and steelhead, except for fish from the Tucannon River. General trends have been similar to those at the river mouth and at Bonneville Dam, except that a decrease in the number of steelhead in 2010 resulted in a slight decrease in total fish from 2009.
Updated: 4/6/2011
View Data
Year
Chinook Fall
Chinook Spring
Chinook Summer
Coho
Sockeye
Steelhead
Total
1970
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1971
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1972
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1973
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1974
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1975
1
16
8
0
0
17
43
1976
0
16
7
0
1
23
47
1977
1
36
8
0
0
51
96
1978
1
41
12
0
0
30
83
1979
0
7
3
0
0
25
35
1980
0
5
3
0
0
40
49
1981
0
13
3
0
0
40
57
1982
1
12
4
0
0
73
90
1983
1
10
4
0
0
87
101
1984
1
7
5
0
0
99
112
1985
1
25
5
0
0
114
145
1986
1
32
6
0
0
134
173
1987
1
29
6
0
0
69
105
1988
1
29
6
0
0
87
123
1989
1
13
3
0
0
133
149
1990
0
17
5
0
0
57
80
1991
1
7
4
0
0
100
111
1992
1
21
3
0
0
121
147
1993
1
21
8
0
0
67
97
1994
1
3
1
0
0
48
52
1995
1
1
1
0
0
81
84
1996
1
4
3
0
0
86
94
1997
1
34
11
0
0
86
132
1998
2
10
4
0
0
72
88
1999
3
3
3
0
0
74
85
2000
4
34
4
1
0
113
156
2001
9
172
14
1
0
263
458
2002
12
75
22
0
0
219
329
2003
12
71
16
1
0
181
281
2004
15
71
9
4
0
154
253
2005
11
26
7
2
0
156
202
2006
8
23
7
1
0
146
185
2007
10
23
7
3
0
157
200
2008
17
50
23
3
1
175
269
2009
15
50
14
5
1
324
409
2010
42
94
29
2
2
206
375
Hatchery Production
Hatchery Production of Salmon and Steelhead in the Columbia River Basin 10
In 2009, more than 143 million salmon and steelhead were released in the Columbia River Basin. Hatchery programs are categorized, based on their genetic broodstock management strategy, as either integrated (i.e., composite population of natural and hatchery origin fish) or segregated (i.e., distinct population reproductively isolated from natural populations). The purpose of these programs are either to provide harvest opportunities, serve as a conservation measure, or both.
During FY 2010, BPA funded projects in the Columbia River Basin to improve wetland, instream, riparian, and riparian-upland habitat zones that are important for the conservation and restoration of anadromous fish. General descriptions of the project-types and the habitat zones that are addressed through the implementation of the associated actions are listed below. A more thorough description of the actions is included in Appendix.
The accomplishments of a given habitat project can be measured several different ways. For example, a project for which the focus is to increase instream habitat complexity may have the following objectives: 1.) install a specific number of structures and 2.) treat a specified number of stream miles. Similarly, the installation of wells, pipelines, sprinklers, etc. can provide multiple benefits (e.g., primary stream miles improved, total stream miles improved, cfs of water conserved, and acre-feet of water conserved).
Increase instream complexity and stabilization, remove vegetation
58.65 miles
61.12 miles stream complexity improved
Increase instream complexity and stabilization, remove vegetation
58.65 miles
2,067 structures installed
Increase instream habitat complexity and stabilization
12 barriers
14 barriers addressed
Removal/install diversion, remove/breach dam, install fish passage structure
460.35 miles
460.95 miles habitat accessed
Removal/install diversion, remove/breach dam, install fish passage structure
545.65 miles
449.9 miles primary stream reach improved
Install well, install pipeline, install sprinkler, acquire water instream
18.4 cfs
17.4 cfs water conserved
Install well, install pipeline, install sprinkler, acquire water instream
1,259.95 miles
1,318.1 miles total stream reach improved
Install well, install pipeline, install sprinkler, acquire water instream
230.9 acre-feet
228.9 acre-feet water conserved
Install well, install pipeline, install sprinkler, acquire water instream
207.98
161.98 acres affected
Realign connect and/or create channel
9.8 miles
9 miles stream added
Realign connect and/or create channel
2 screens
2 screens addressed
Remove/install diversion
51,022.2 acre-feet
23,935.2 acre-feet water screened
Install fish screen
99.5 cfs
99.2 cfs water screened
Install fish screen
78.8 miles
73 miles improved
Acquire water instream
29,349.1 acre-feet
34,710.4 acre-feet water protected
Acquire water instream
164.34 cfs
177.93 cfs water protected
Acquire water instream
692.62 acres
630.87 acres treated
Plant/remove vegetation
140.31 miles
123.69 miles vegetation treated
Plant/remove vegetation
77.19 miles
78.07 miles protected
Purchase land, lease land
42,666 acres
44,346.4 acres protected
Conduct controlled burn, plant vegetation, practice no-till and conservation tillage, remove vegetation, upland erosion and sedimentation control, enhance floodplain, create, restore, and enhance wetland
668.37 acres
1,137.28 acres treated
Install fence
10.25 acres
10.25 acres protected
Install fence
33.95 miles
32.94 miles fence installed
Install fence
30.11 miles
26.3 miles stream fenced
Decommission roads, relocate roads, improve roads
658.93 miles
670.08 miles road treated
Updated: 5/1/2011
* Data presented is for fiscal year 2010
* This table may not represent all efforts completed as data are updated on a daily basis.
Salmon Survival
Salmon and steelhead survival depends in part on the hydrology of the Columbia River Basin in conjunction with operation of the hydrosystem. Juveniles in particular rely on flow to aid downstream migration, but annual discharge rate can fluctuate greatly. Flow is further regulated by the hydropower system. Dams have altered the seasonal flow of the basin to meet electricity, irrigation, flood control, navigation, recreation, and water supply demands. What was once a free-flowing river with a broad complex of habitats has been converted to a series of reservoirs.
Survival of juvenile salmonids may be directly affected by passage at dams, by the increased time and energy needed for migration to the ocean, or by other factors related to the changed river such as predation, disease, or thermal stress. Adult migration may be delayed or blocked by dams, and may also be affected by predation.
Actions intended to increase the survival of migrating juvenile salmonids include flow enhancement at critical times, increased spill at dams, placement of structures to increase passage efficiency, transportation past dams and reservoirs, and predation control measures. Actions to increase survival of migrating adults have been largely completed, and focused on increasing passage efficiency at dams. Predation control is an additional measure.
Survival of Adult Upper Columbia River Salmonids from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam 552
Note: 1. 2-6% SAR is goal of Northwest Power and Conservation Council 2. (C0) in 2001 assumed to equal (C1) 3. 2008 information available only for “Overall"
View Data
Year
2% Goal (Lower)
6% Goal (Upper )
In-River; Bypassed at Least Once (C1)
In-River; Migrated via Spill or Turbines (C0)
Overall
Transported (T0)
1997
2.00
6.00
0.23
0.66
1.16
1.45
1998
2.00
6.00
0.21
1.07
0.30
0.21
1999
2.00
6.00
0.76
1.35
2.84
3.07
2000
2.00
6.00
1.81
1.92
2.66
2.79
2001
2.00
6.00
0.07
0.07
2.47
2.49
2002
2.00
6.00
0.94
0.67
2.14
2.84
2003
2.00
6.00
0.52
0.45
1.57
1.99
2004
2.00
6.00
0.06
0.06
0.85
0.87
2005
2.00
6.00
0.17
0.17
0.80
0.84
2006
2.00
6.00
0.60
1.54
1.14
1.31
2007
2.00
6.00
1.72
1.42
2.56
4.18
2008
2.00
6.00
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
Predation on Salmonids
Predation research and management in the Columbia River, to date, has historically focused on losses of juvenile salmonids to predacious fish (primarily northern pikeminnow) and birds (primarily Caspian terns and cormorants). Predation by non-native fish such as smallmouth bass, walleye, and channel catfish has also become a concern. Initial steps have been taken to evaluate and manage predation by these non-natives. In recent years, predation on adult salmonids and white sturgeon by sea lions below Bonneville Dam has become an additional concern. Actions to reduce this predation have recently been implemented.
The goal of the Northern Pikeminnow Management Program (NPMP) is to reduce predation on juvenile salmonids through sustained harvest of northern pikeminnow. The NPMP is based on research conducted from 1983-93 that indicated: (1) loss of juvenile salmonids to resident fish predators was significant, (2) northern pikeminnow were responsible for a majority of the losses, and (3) relatively large reductions in predation could be achieved through relatively low exploitation of northern pikeminnow. Since the NPMP was implemented in 1990, program fisheries have harvested more than 3.5 million northern pikeminnow, with annual harvest rates (for fish > 250 mm) averaging approximately 13%. Models indicate that annual losses of juvenile salmonids to northern pikeminnow have decreased approximately 40% from pre-program levels. Empirical evidence supports these results. There is no evidence of compensation in predation, growth, or reproduction by surviving northern pikeminnow, or by other resident fish predators.
Updated: 4/6/2011
Updated: 4/6/2011
View Data
Northern Pikeminnow Catch and Index of Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Year
Catch (Thousands)
Relative Predation Index (%)
1990
20
100
1991
159.2
98.461
1992
186.9
95.872
1993
104.5
87.272
1994
129.4
85.502
1995
199.8
78.597
1996
157.2
72.205
1997
119.5
68.151
1998
108.9
70.638
1999
114.7
71.756
2000
189.7
71.037
2001
240.9
70.876
2002
201.4
67.746
2003
196.6
65.865
2004
267.4
67.818
2005
241.4
640494
2006
233.9
62.296
2007
192.5
63.332
2008
158.2
61.849
2009
141.645
60
2010
173.981
650
Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids in the Lower Columbia River 557
A 1997 study found that Caspian terns nesting on Rice Island, a dredged material disposal island, were a significant predator of juvenile salmonids. Island supported the largest Caspian tern breeding colony in the world (16,000 birds), and these birds consumed more juvenile salmonids than any other prey. Terns were subsequently relocated closer to the ocean on East Sand Island. By 2000, 94% of all terns in the estuary nested on East Sand Island. Since 2001, all Caspian terns nesting in the Columbia River estuary have used East Sand Island, and this relocation resulted in a sharp drop in consumption of juvenile salmonids. Double-crested cormorants are another common piscivorous waterbird in the Columbia River Estuary. East Sand Island now supports 10-15,000 breeding pairs, compared to about 100 pairs in 1990.
Updated: 3/19/2010
Updated: 3/19/2010
View Data
Abundance of Colonial Birds and Consumption of Juvenile Salmon in the Columbia River Estuary
Year
Caspian Tern Breeding Pairs
Tern Consumption
Cormorant Consumption
Cormorant Breeding Pairs
1997
8
7.26
6.1
1998
8.725
11.37
7.07
1999
8.865
12.32
6.46
2000
9.135
6.63
7.115
2001
9
5.37
8.2
2002
10.1
5.68
10.1
2003
8.7
4.2
5.5
10.6
2004
9.8
4
6.3
12.1
2005
8.9
3.9
3
11.9
2006
9.3
5.4
8.9
13.8
2007
9.9
5.5
9.2
13.8
2008
10.75
6.7
10.9
Predation on Adult Salmonids by Sea Lions Near Bonneville Dam 558
Predation on adult salmonids by California and Steller sea lions has been generally increasing, with at least 2.4% of the total run from (January through May) consumed each year since 2006. Predation is primarily on Chinook salmon, with the remainder on steelhead. These values represent predation at Bonneville Dam. Predation rates in the remainder of the lower river are unknown. Most predation on salmonids (usually >90%) is by California sea lions, with Steller sea lions consuming mostly white sturgeon (2,172 in 2010). Pacific lamprey are also consumed by California sea lions; however predation rates relative to this species are unknown. Sea lion deterrents utilized have included physical barriers to fishways, acoustic devices, and harassment. Trapping and removal has been implemented since 2008.
Updated: 12/07/2010
Pacific Lamprey
Pacific Lamprey Background
Like salmon, Pacific lamprey are anadromous; however, their life-cycle is more complex than that of salmon. Juvenile lamprey remain burrowed in the substrate of streams for 4 to 6 years before emerging and migrating to the ocean in late-winter or early-spring. After 2 to 3 years in the ocean, adults return to streams from July to October and spawn the following spring.
Indigenous peoples from the Pacific Northwest have harvested adult lamprey for subsistence, religious, and medicinal purposes for many generations. Although historical population sizes of lamprey are unknown, adult Pacific lampreys were an important tribal subsistence food.
Pacific lamprey were likely widely distributed throughout the Columbia River Basin, but counts at dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers indicate a severe decline in Pacific lamprey abundance. Annual counts at Bonneville Dam prior to 1970 often exceeded 250,000 fish. Counts at most dams have decreased dramatically in recent years.
Declining trends in abundance suggest that productivity may be limited for all populations. Passage obstructions, degraded habitat, and impaired water quality are all factors that are decreasing the rate of population growth. Predation by exotic predators (e.g., smallmouth bass) may also decrease lamprey productivity.
Recent efforts have begun to address some of these limiting factors and threats, especially passage of adults at mainstem dams. Structures designed to improve the collection and passage of lamprey have been installed at Bonneville Dam, with installations at other dams planned for future years. Gratings and screens will be replaced to enhance passage. Sharp corners in and around fish ladders are being rounded to further improve adult passage. Velocity-reducing structures are being evaluated. Adult and juvenile lamprey passage needs will be evaluated at each dam.
Genetic population structure for Pacific lamprey is currently unknown in the Columbia River Basin, thus, specific populations or management groups cannot be displayed at this time. In addition, little is known about adult returns to specific waters.
Updated: 5/1/2011
Hydroelectric Facility / No
1
Bonneville
16
Kerr
31
Palisades
2
The Dalles
17
Hungry Horse
32
Big Cliff
3
John Day
18
Libby
33
Detroit
4
McNary
19
Ice Harbor
34
Foster
5
Chandler
20
Lower Monumental
35
Green Peter
6
Roz
21
Little Goose
36
Cougar
7
Priest Rapids
22
Lower Granite
37
Dexter
8
Wanapum
23
Dworshak
38
Lookout Point
9
Rock Island
24
Hells Canyon
39
Hills Creek
10
Rocky Reach
25
Oxbow
11
Wells
26
Brownlee
12
Chief Joseph
27
Black Canyon
13
Grand Coulee
28
Boise River Diversion
14
Albeni Falls
29
Anderson Ranch
15
Noxon Rapids
30
Minidoka
Counts of Adult Pacific Lamprey at Bonneville, McNary and Lower Granite Dams 10
Dam counts are used to index the relative abundance of Pacific lamprey, but these counts are of limited use in estimating actual abundance. Many adult lamprey pass at night when counting is not conducted. In addition, numerous routes are available for lamprey to pass dams without being detected. Research to develop more accurate counting methods is underway.
View Data
Counts of Adult Pacific Lamprey
Year
Bonneville
McNary
Granite
1997
20,891
1,122
1998
37,515
1999
37,296
2000
19,002
1,281
28
2001
27,947
2,539
27
2002
100,476
11,282
128
2003
117,029
13,325
282
2004
61,780
5,888
117
2005
26,664
4,158
40
2006
38,938
2,456
35
2007
19,313
3,454
34
2008
14,562
1,530
61
2009
8,622
676
12
2010
11,183
833
15
Resident fish Substitution
Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Resident Fish Substitution Policy
Resident fish populations throughout the Columbia River Basin have been affected by the construction and operation of the hydropower system. Dams altered natural river flows, inundated spawning and rearing areas, and blocked natural migration patterns. Historically, more than two million salmon and steelhead annually spawned in the upper Columbia River and Snake River basins
Mitigation for the annual losses of anadromous fish in these blocked areas is achieved through the release of hatchery-produced fish such as kokanee, rainbow trout, brook trout, Lahontan cutthroat trout, and largemouth bass as well as habitat projects to benefit resident fish populations. These efforts are essential for providing tribal subsistence and public recreation fisheries, opportunities that were lost due the lack of passage for anadromous fish to reach historic spawning areas.
The Northwest Power and Conservation Council “finds that mitigation in areas blocked to salmon and steelhead by the development and operation of the hydropower system is appropriate, and flexibility in the approach utilized for mitigation is necessary. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s resident fish substitution policy authorizes “restoring native and resident fish species to near historic ranges where habitat can be feasibly restored.” The policy also calls for taking actions to reintroduce anadromous fish into areas blocked by dams such as Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee, where feasible, and for administering and increasing opportunities for consumptive and non-consumptive resident fisheries for native, introduced, wild and hatchery-reared stocks that are compatible with the continued persistence of native resident fish species. This includes intensive fisheries within closed or isolated systems and recreational fisheries such as those in northeastern Washington and northwestern Montana.
Resident Fish Substitution for Lost Anadromous Fish Opportunities